A Law that Legalizes Murder

The Stakes could never be higher for the unborn.  And now the “Left” has raised the ante, which is something of a dare to attempt to stop them.  New York State has set a new tone for abortions, for which it is now lawful to perform an outright murder of a child immediately after birth.  However, there are Federal Laws in place to protect children, for which that protection can go as far as a judge ordering a child forced into cancer treatment.   

The addition of murdering a child soon after birth goes against the edict and authority of “Child Protective Services,” for which the authority of this agency comes from the “Mariage License.”  I know, this is not what one would expect, but is entirely true.  Marriage licensing was first instituted in 1968, which immediately followed the re-organization of the United States that was caused by the protest of the “Slave States.,” whose legislative representatives did not show up as per “Article I, Section 4 and clause 2” of our Constitution, which was a threat of those same “Slave States,” if Lincoln was elected.  Therefore, at least in theory, the “Republic of the United States” was dissolved, and was re-organized as I stated above, into the “Corporation of the United States.” 

Despite the above, it is necessary to go back to origins, otherwise all understanding as to “why,” would be lost, for this is why we should study in depth; history, but not the history as re-written as per the “Liberal Agenda.,” but history as written from the contemporaries of those who lived in that venue.  State-sponsored education is all about shaping and forming a society as the government views it.  When the “Liberals” are in charge—they will purposely omit whatever does not fit their narrative, with the addition of applying “political correctness.”  It has been 23 years since the “Los Angeles Times” first instituted “political correctness,” which means one young generation has passed, most likely not knowing the origin of “political correctness,” and never questioned where it originated.  I am sorry to say this same mentioned generation is ignorant of something they are espousing.

Also, as a matter of being “legal,” we were numbered by the FDR Administration, along with our name in all capital letters, for which is a “legal fiction,” or corporation, for which a corporation has no rights—for this is the reason we are subjected to “Contract Law,” such as the “Marriage License.”  Everyone who receives any document from the government and in many cases from some commercial enterprises, such as banks, will always render our names in all capital letters, which is addressing the “legal fiction,” or “corporation.”

The above caught me by surprise, because now, by law, the woman carrying the child now can decide whether or not the child lives or dies.  However, in what I just described above, it is by “contract law” that children are wards of the “State,” for which it is the “State” that makes such decisions, for which “Child Protective Services” should be involved.  However, there is just one more letter of the law that prevents the above from happening—it is the “Birth Certificate,” for which this is the document that warehouses us into “human resources,” and the “Death Certificate” removes us from the “human resources” inventory.  Yes, my friends, we are bought and sold on the market as slaves, for this is why our signature is worth billions of dollars, for which we receive a minuscule share.

So it seems that the birth mother can make a “life and death” decision for the newborn child, because there is no “Birth Certificate,” and therefore no “legal fiction” or “corporation” can be added to the “human resources” inventory. 

As dark as the above might be, there is a much darker side to the new law of “legalized murder,” which actually should not be so surprising because of some states that allow euthanizing, for which I somewhat agree, but for one personal reason—I would rather be dead than be a victim of our technology.  Yes, technology can save lives, but also prolong life in a vegetative state, for which if it is within my power not to be imperiled by the technical prowess of sustaining a useless life, DNR.

The Darker Side of the New Law

Upon doing research, I discovered disturbing practices that date back to ancient times and at the very least metaphorically taking place now.  The song is the same but played in a different tune.  I am referring to the practice of “child sacrifice.”  Ancient history is rife with the practice of sacrificing children to so-called “appease a deity.” 

In the country of Uganda, children are routinely kidnapped, dismembered and included in rituals of witchcraft.  Kidnappers are paid $1400 for each child.  The practice carries the death penalty, but few are convicted.  Despite the superstitions of places like Uganda, this same practice of “child sacrifice” is practiced in Europe as well as in the United States.  So as one can see, sex is not the only reason as to why our children are kidnapped. 

Also, we need to question as to how these new-born sacrifices are being disposed of and probably sold, such as when a hidden camera exposed the buying and selling of fetuses from “Planned Parenthood.”  Is it possible, that this new law is designed for the specific purpose of allowing a child to be born for an unknown market?