April 7th 2017 Blog

I am sure you have heard about Devin Nunes stepping down from the Congressional investigation involving the Russian interference of our recent national election.  There were several left-wing groups who filed a complaint to a government ethics office.  It is rather funny how all these different left-wing groups filed a complaint all at the same time, which means there had to be a coordinator, informing all these groups on what to do and how to do it.  And I firmly believe it was former President Obama who is that coordinator and I can back that up, even though no one else clued me in, which means this is purely conjecture on my part, but based upon some facts and why I surmised my firm belief.

We know that former President Obama was somehow able to come up with money not only for Iran, but also to covertly fund liberal groups.  There are always lawsuits coming against people from the government all the time and all the money rewarded to the government from those lawsuits are supposed to go directly to the United States Treasury.  However, somehow Obama was able to circumvent that protocol and keep those funds from the Treasury and used that money for his own purposes.  No one in the news was able to answer the question of how Obama got all that money he was giving away, but that particular question was never cited!!!

It is the Congress who holds all the purse strings for expenditures, but Obama circumvented those financial channels, as he did many times before when the legislature would not move on his agendas, using “Executive Orders” instead of the proper legislation process or protocol.  Nevertheless, I firmly believe the same left-wing groups that Obama gave all that money to, were called upon to get Devin Nunes removed from the Russian investigation and it worked! 

Even though Obama is out of office, he vowed to cause trouble for the next administration and the very reason why he is still located in the Washington D.C. area; in a large house with plenty of bedrooms to house all his former boot-lickers, like Sandra Rice and Valerie Plaine, who were his closest advisors.

Surprise!  President Trump is no slouch when it comes to decisive action, so in response to the gassing of civilians in Syria, President Trump ordered more than 40 Tomahawk missiles to be fired upon Syrian airports and chemical facilities.  If Obama were still in office, he would “draw another red line” and do nothing.  President Trump is far more astute than to tip his hand as to warn the enemy of an impending attack.  How much warning was given to the latest victims of gassing?  Can you spell “zero”?  In addition, Syria is not equipped to precisely place those gas bombs, so it is easy to say that only the Russians have that capability, for which Nicky Haley gave the Russians an ultimatum…do something or we (the United States) will!  24 hours was more than enough time for the Russians to make up their minds and did not think or believe that such a preemptive raid was in President Trump’s mind.  Unless President Assad sues for peace, he can full-well expect more such raids.   However, the "wild card" in this equation is Iran's involvement and it would not be surprising if some terrorist cell groups in the United States may stage their own raids in response.

The Russians might rattle their sabers, but personally I do not believe that Putin wants a direct confrontation with the United States.  There is only one thing at stake for the Russians in Syria… a much coveted warm-water port that they were able to secure.  Russia is well-known to be a “bear”, which simply means once they gain something, they are not so quick to surrender it.  In my opinion, I believe that President Putin might request a pow-wow with President Trump, for which Trump might consider allowing Russian to retain their “warm-water port” if they cease from using their aircraft for Assad.  However, Assad might have other thoughts about that, because I am quite sure that Assad traded a “warm-water port” for Russian air support.   

April 5^th 2017 Blog

It cannot be over stressed the way the Demoncrats continue the narrative of a direct relationship with President Trump and the Russians.  In reality, that narrative is not truly the issue—the issue is the distain that is shared by both the media and the Demoncracts—that it is President Trump who is sitting in the Oval Office.  One outstanding proof is the Neil Gorsuch nomination for a seat on the Supreme Court.  It was about 10 years ago that the Demoncrats who voted overwhelmingly, the approval of Neil Gorsuch to be a sitting Federal Judge in the 10^th Court Circuit.  What changed?  I am not going to answer this question, for this needs to be answered by the court of public opinion, because what is my particular opinion compared to the many thousands of other opinions?  However, what is more important, is to ask the right question and I dare say that some who are asked, “What Changed”, might not be able to give an answer, only because the specific question does not fit the “Liberal” narrative or agenda.

What question should be asked especially to the media in general; why are they beating a dead horse?  The issue of the Russians specifically interfering with our election process, has already been answered by three high ranking intelligence people in as many agencies, but unfortunately this does not seem good enough, because it does nothing to support the “Liberal” agenda. 

I think it is very important to take careful note that during the Clinton Administration, it was this Administration who “Federalized” our education system.  Whenever anything is “Federalized” it is always going to cost more money for taxpayer, to support another bureaucracy and the very reason why it costs more to educate our children.  In addition, in order to fulfill the “Federal” agenda of what was then called “Goals 2000”, there were many “Liberal” guidelines of policy to adhere to, in order to receive “Federal Funding” for the additional costs that will be incurred.  Some of those policies included, “lying is acceptable behavior when needed” and “the government can do no wrong”, which includes when the government is lying, emphasis mine.

More than 30 years have passed since just these two “policies” have thoroughly indoctrinated our children, who believe the government can do no wrong, only when the “Liberals” are in charge.  And then we wonder why these children who were educated through “Goals 2000”, who are now ranging approximately 20 to 35 years in age, act so precipitately against those who oppose the “Liberal agenda”.   

“The mold of a man stems from the mind of a child.  Educators have known this from time and memorial, so have tyrants,” quoted from the narrator from the old “The Outer Limits” (1963-1966), the episode titled, “The Special One”.  The time has come to step back into history written from the contemporaries of the time for which these historical accounts have taken place and not from the government controlled textbooks that are funneled into the minds of our children, all for the sake of power for those few who not only rule over us, but have made merchandise of those who sit back from their hard days at work and watch more government controlled television programming that include “Liberal” controlled so-called “news”.

If you recall in prior blogs; I stated that the above is probably one main reason why the Roman Empire had fallen and we are a “hair’s breadth” away from this very same fate, because we decided that so-called “social justice” is more important than the truth.  What is the truth?  Truth is where you find it, just like either “water” or “gold”.  “When the legends become fact—print the legend.” Robert Wuhl, actor and educator.  We must not fear, because fear is the “mind killer” and one of the distinct reasons why I published a book titled, “What Difference Does It Make?!” and the very reason why I stated in large bold print the following warning on the title page:

“WARNING: I full well expect this book to be viewed by those of attorney status, which includes judges and also expect they will attempt to get this book banned!” 

The cover of this book alone is going to draw attention, for which aptly describes the contents therein and the overt reason for the title, which happens to be the title I adopted for this particular blog!  I personally do not fear the truth, even to the point of being banned as an author; as was William Guy Carr, back in 1958.  I dare anyone to find any of William Guy Carr’s books in any public library!  For it was William Guy Carr, whose fearlessness inspired me to study law back in 1994 and molded me into the man I am today, which also helped me to cultivate writing skills I never knew I had since 2002.  There is only one thing I will never apologize for and that is “the truth”!

April 4^th 2017 Blog

It truly amazes me how the press will do all they can to maintain the narrative of the so-called “connection of President Trump with the Russians”.  I simply cannot help but to highlight what Press Secretary Sean Spicer said to April Ryan, in an answer to her rant about a Russian connection or collusion with President Trump.

After hearing the following dissertation, in regards to the above paragraph, I lost it, but those in the White House Press Room were not amused.  This is where the failure of the media comes to play—whenever a truth is used in a metaphoric way, it becomes a joke.  All those present in the White House Press Room simply did not get the joke, to wit:

Sean Spicer—“April, go ahead.”

Question: “All right, thank you.  Sean—don’t seem so happy.  Anyway, with all of these investigations, questions of what “is” is, how does this administration try to revamp its image?  Two and a half months in, you’ve got this Yates story today, you’ve got other things going on, you’ve got Russia, you’ve got wiretapping, you’ve got”—

Mr. Spicer: “No, we don’t have that.”

Question: “There are investigations on Capitol Hill”—

Mr. Spicer: “No, no—I get it.  But you keep—I’ve said it from the day that I got here until whenever that there is no connection.  You’ve got Russia.  If the President puts Russian salad dressing on his salad tonight, somehow that’s a Russian connection.”

And the beat goes on…I put the joke in bold to draw attention to it.  If one goes further on with White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s rant, it goes against all those who simply cannot get over a so-called “Trump/Russian collusion.  Ironically, it is the liberal press and the Demoncrats who are in collusion.  The so-called “connection” the liberals and the press are seeking, is that the Russians were directly affecting the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, for which when questioning at least 3 heads of those in charge of our nation’s security, cannot find any evidence to this assertion.  The so-called “evidence” simply does not exist!

This Friday President Trump will be meeting with President Xi Jinping of China.  The basic agenda is going to be two distinct items—our trade with China and North Korea, for which President Trump was not shy about “consequences” for a nuclear attack upon the United States or its allies.  I read that as “tit for tat”. 

It must be clear that North Korea has no affiliation whatsoever with the United Nations, which simply means anything North Korea does will have no bearing on any decisions the United Nations might have, in regards to any aggression promulgated by North Korea and the United States has the absolute right to make North Korea a memory, should North Korea decides to launch a nuclear missile.  Yes, there will be plenty of blow back from all over the world, but we cannot allow a bully to carry on with a weapon of mass destruction.

There is no doubt that Iran will have their ears perked up, because they also have intentions of using a nuclear device on the State of Israel.  I know for a fact that President Trump will not offer any apology to answer a nuclear force with an equal amount of nuclear force, for the simple reason North Korea was duly warned not to take such action, which is a far cry from President Obama’s so-called “two red lines” against Syria.  Personally, I would not want to see the above scenario happen, but if this particular scenario did play out—North Korea would most certainly deserve it.

March 30^th 2017 Blog

The Senate Intelligence Committee met today to interview some witnesses regarding the Russian spying on our nation.  I was able to view some of this, but most of it was behind closed doors, because of the classified information that has been discussed.  However, I can give you my analysis of what I viewed this morning, for the first and only witness Dr. Roy Godson I was able to view.  Dr. Roy Godson was explaining the matrix of the Russian interference into world politics, so as you can see, we in the United States are not alone in these cyber attacks.  He highlights the phrase, “active measures” employed by the Russians.  The Obama Administration discounted the Russian threat by telling FBI Director James Comey to ignore it and be quiet.

There is more to this than meets the eye, considering all the Russian coziness of some Americans, namely the Clintons, John Postesta, etc., who had secured financial gains doing business with the Russians, during the years of Hitlary Clinton’s tenure in the State Department, between the years of 2008 to 2014.  It had taken 4 years for Hitlary to secure 20 percent of U.S. Uranium production through her foundation and a Canadian company.  So much for “humanitarian aid”.

I am sorry to say that it is quite apparent that the Demoncrats have declared war on anything coming from the Conservative side of our government.  “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”  The Demoncrats simply cannot understand why they have taken very heavy losses on a nationwide scale in the past 8 years.  Have they ever seriously considered that it has been the “Liberal” values that many Americans find so repugnant and also discovered that those views simply do not work?

There was a time when both parties would engage in battle in the halls of both the House and the Senate—then later met at the local watering hole.  This is no longer taking place, which simply means we can no longer expect to overtly witness the opposition crossing party lines.  There is far more attention being focused on “party differences” and so little focus on the problems that are now in crisis mode.  Doing the right thing has taken a backseat to the “Liberal” bias that has incubated from our “Liberal” colleges; spread into our once venerated institutions and expanded very broadly into our now thoroughly corrupted bureaucracies, who sometimes wield more power than our legislatures.  This is why I firmly believe that our bureaucracies have morphed into a 4^th branch of our government.

Now, in order to back up this claim, one must consider the true reason for both WWI and WWII.  One might consider this last statement as a non-sequitur, so let me explain:  There was only one true reason for both world wars—the removal of the crowned heads of Europe and replaced with either a democratic or communistic form of government, for which both of them can be more easily corrupted than dealing with one stubborn monarch.  This is the precise agenda of “The Matrix” whose end game agenda is complete dominance over the entire planet.  You may have read from my prior blogs that this “Matrix” was started in the year 1700, for which every major war since then was planned and executed.  WWI did quite a bit of damage, but now quite enough, for which WWII became necessary to finish the job.  “Anything political is planned”, Franklin Roosevelt. And it does not matter who pays the price, for even those who maintain “The Matrix” did declare they did lose some of their own during WWII!

I have also cited in at least one other prior blog that it was Banksters, who started WWI and it was Henry Ford in his 1914 newsletter, where this accusation was highlighted.  Ford did mention “Jews” instead of my emphasis of “Banksters”, for which some “Jews” were among those “Banksters”, but not all of them were “Jews”.  And it is my firm belief that it was this particular rant of Ford that began the “anti-Semitic movement in the United States that prompted our nation to refuse taking in “Jews” during the exodus of the “Jews” from Europe, just before our involvement in that conflict.     

March 29^th 2017 Blog

Yesterday, President Trump met with members of the “Fraternal Order of Police”.  This should be a clear message that President Trump is serious about law and order.  Did President Obama ever invite them to the White House?  From what I have witnessed as far as Obama is concerned, was that he hardened his heart whenever police officers were gunned down, which seems to be quite systemic to the general attitude of those of Obama’s race.  Now before you label me as a “racist”; if one thinks clearly about it, the phrase “Black Lives Matter” is a racist slogan, as is “Affirmative Action” and “Reparations”.

In addition, President Trump did a presidential first; sign an “Executive Order” for energy independence and another “Executive Order” to roll back every Obama energy regulation.  Every since the so-called, “Energy Crisis” of 1973; the United States has never instituted a definitive energy policy.  The instability of the Middle East should have been a clarion call for an energy policy that would strive for huge cuts in oil imports.  But instead for the past 45 years allowed the importing of oil from nations, who have proven historically as well as presently, to be unstable factors, for which pricing is determined upon who is at war with whom.

There is a systemic reason why we never had a comprehensive energy policy, in regards to oil imports.  That reason is the agenda of “The Matrix”, that is and has been instrumental in the incremental destruction of the United States.  The Clintons, Obama, George Soros, Bill Gates and yes even Oprah are card carrying members of this “Matrix”. 

Ever since last week, the news cannot take its attention away from Devin Nunes.  The reason is simply a political one and the media takes the ball and runs it down field, in the hopes of making a “touch-down”, in order to take President Trump down.  The reason why a Demoncratic ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee has been quite vocal about Nunes going to the White House, instead of first informing the other members of this same committee, is in my opinion that the “leaks” might be coming straight out of this same committee, from at least one Demoncratic member.  Nunes continues to say that he is simply doing his job and the Demoncrats are calling for Nunes to recuse himself from the so-called “Russian” connection.  It has been  proven by all the intelligence agencies that the Russians had absolutely no effect upon the outcome of the last national election.

And the fun does not stop there!  Yesterday during Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s continuing “soap opera” (words from a commentator) there seems to be no end to the “Russian Connection” from the Press Corp.  The following is an excerpt of a rant to this agenda.

Q    All right, thank you.  Sean -- don’t seem so happy.  Anyway, with all of these investigations, questions of what is is, how does this administration try to revamp its image?  Two and a half months in, you’ve got this Yates story today, you’ve got other things going on, you’ve got Russia, you’ve got  wiretapping, you’ve got --

MR. SPICER:  No, we don’t have that. 
 
Q    There are investigations on Capitol Hill --

MR. SPICER:  No, no -- I get it.  But you keep -- I’ve said it from the day that I got here until whatever that there is no connection.  You’ve got Russia.  If the President puts Russian salad dressing on his salad tonight, somehow that’s a Russian connection.  But every single person --

Q    It’s beyond that.  You're making it--

MR. SPICER:  Well, no -- I appreciate your agenda here, but the reality is --

Q    It's not my agenda.

MR. SPICER:  No, hold on.  At some point, report the facts.  The facts are that every single person who has been briefed on this subject has come away with the same conclusion -- Republican, Democrat.  So I’m sorry that that disgusts you.  You’re shaking your head.  I appreciate it, but --

Q    I'm shaking my head and I’m listening, and I’m trying to get --

MR. SPICER:  Okay, but understand this -- that at some point, the facts are what they are, and every single person who has been briefed on this situation with respect to the situation with Russia -- Republican, Democrat, Obama-appointee, career -- have all come to the same conclusion.  At some point, April, you’re going to have to take “no” for an answer, with respect to whether or not there was collusion.

 I purposely put two sentences in bold, because it deserves some attention as to how the media, along with the Demoncrats are continuing to grasp at straws to finding fault or some tiny flaw that may spark some movement to topple President Trump.  However, if any of my readers had viewed “Morning Joe” the other day; it was Evelyn Frakas who revealed that Obama did indeed spy on Trump both before and after the November election.  This is the real news that should have shook up all the media and incensed the Demoncrats.

March 27^th 2017 Blog

It seems that a new initiative has taken place in the White House, with the addition of “The Office of American Innovation”, which will bring business management to the workings of government.  There is no better place if one wants to waste and misspend money than in the realm of government.  Yes, it is possible that this new office can breed a new bureaucracy, but this depends upon the motivation(s) of those who are in charge.  We have already had a taste of this type of management from President Trump, when negotiating with both Boeing and Lockheed that saved the American taxpayer 1.7 billion dollars, with just a few phone calls—no bureaucrats and no Congress to get in the way.

It was not entirely surprising when President Trump and Paul Ryan could not get a full Republican consensus with the “American Health Care Act”.  According to some, it is not dead just yet.  Although this legislation was voted down; in the wake of a “no confidence vote” from the “Freedom Caucus”, some Democrats have reached out to both President Trump and his staffers to perhaps breathe new life into this legislation with some fresh ideas.  We cannot declare the “American Health Care Act” has fallen by the wayside, but at least for now is simmering on the back-burner.  President Trump gave it his best shot, but now it is time to move on to tax reform.

The Liberal press is at it again—stressing the narrative of lumping together the Russians with the “leaks” in Washington; possibly from the White House.  Both Senator Trey Goudy and White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, were very clear that the above are separate issues.  We already know that the investigation of the interference of the Russians into our election process, yielded no evidence whatsoever of swinging the last national election, one way or the other.  This just leaves us with the “leaks”, for which evidence has been discovered by the ranking member of the “Intelligence Committee”, Nunes, poring over documents, supplied from various sources, for which certain names appeared that were “unmasked” by someone who has access to classified information.

Normally, according to NSA Director Mike Rogers; American citizens who are implicated with foreign agents, are listed as anonymous in the documentation of transcripts, involving foreign communications, until such time as a criminal investigation takes place and is passed on to the FBI.  However, in this case, unmasking took place before an investigation was called upon and apparently those “unmasked” might be those currently working in the White House.  This is what alerted Nunes to visit the White House with this information and not first informing the rest of the “Intelligence Committee” first.  This move by Nunes miffed another ranking member of the “Intelligence Committee” Adam Schiff to appear in two news conferences and communicating his dismay over Nunes going before the media and then to the White House.  What Nunes did was not political, but it was the unprecedented unmasking that prompted him to visit the White House.  

There seems to be no doubt that some Obama leftovers were involved in the “unmasking”.  Tomorrow is Tuesday and both James Comey and Mike Rogers will be in closed session and grilled about who and why someone “unmasked” the named persons in the documents Nunes examined.  According to Mike Rogers, there are only 20 people under him who have access to “masked” persons of interest.  And as I stated above, upon the premise of a criminal investigation, the documents and the “unmasked names” would then be passed on to the FBI and then to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution.  No doubt that the press will be all over White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer during the press conference tomorrow afternoon, about what transpired in that “closed session”.  We cannot expect much of a revelation for the simple reason that what was discussed behind closed door is classified.  Spicer might elude that the “closed session” was either productive, unproductive or perhaps inconclusive.

March 24^th 2017 Blog

Again, my blog suffered some today because of a personal matter that needed attention.  However, I did something unusual, by sending Senator Al Franken an email, concerning his questioning of Judge Neil Gorsuch and the non-answer he received when citing a particular case, involving a life or death situation.  The following is that email:

Letter to Senator Al Franken Regarding Judge Neil Gorsuch

Senator Al Franken, I was viewing nearly the entire hearing on Tuesday regarding Judge Neil Gorsuch.  In order to give my opinion upon what transpired between you and Judge Neil Gorsuch, I need to qualify myself as being a student of law for more than twenty years and a recent author of a book that is tangible, as to the questions regarding the case of the truck driver, who found himself in a rather desperate situation and acted accordingly, as we agree upon.

I am aware of Neil Gorsuch remaining silent after your presentation of that dire situation and I can tell you precisely why he sided with the company or corporation, for which the driver was employed.  I have some idea as to why Judge Neil Gorsuch remained silent, but that is a matter of supposition.  But in regards to “Contract Law”, I believe that Judge Neil Gorsuch acted on behalf of the employer, only because the driver, as well as other drivers, must have signed a “contract” that was quite specific, whenever such a situation occurs as you described, but it is quite apparent that the contract was not specific, whenever the situation hinged upon a life or death circumstance, for which would be construed as “mitigating circumstances”.  However, it is indeed incumbent upon any “contract” that the “letter of the law” prevails and hence Judge Neil Gorsuch ruling.  So as one can plainly see, “the letter of the law” has the power to kill.

I hope my readers can see that I do have an above average understanding regarding points of law.  And if one knows of Al Franken’s credentials, he is not anything resembling an attorney and relies upon other attorneys for his information, which was quite evident when interviewing a prior President Trump choice for a cabinet position.