Lara Logan

A recent interview with Lara Logan has exposed the “Mainstream Media,” for what it is and has been for decades.  The news has always been biasing from the liberal front, for which is no coincidence.  It is “Powers That Be,” who have promulgated this bias, to put the American People to sleep, while the politicians and bureaucrats forward our government into a brand of socialism. 

Nearly all major news agencies have the news filtered, which is labeled as being safe for the public, in regards to leading us into a socialist reformation.  All one has to do is find out who the owners and producers are who control the news through their various agencies.  Diversity is not allowed in the newsroom, but yet diversity is demanded in every American institution.

All of President Trump’s detractors are furious, be they Demoncrats or Republicans—but for one reason—greed.  It is greed for both money and power that is the primary source of the water for the political swamp known as Washington D.C.

President Trump is being hammered from at least four fronts: Demoncrats; Republicans; the Mainstream Media and Europe.  According to the “Left,” President Trump cannot do anything right.  Okay, why don’t we talk about all the wrongs done by the dictator, who bragged about having a pen and a phone?  The Demoncrats gave him anything he wanted, even if it kills people because they lost their health care coverage, robbed Medicare of nine-hundred million dollars to fund ObamaCare; robbed the Treasury of one-hundred and fifty billion dollars to give to the declared enemy of America and Americans, Iran.   Come on, I can fight anyone of you who think they know better, but cannot deny the facts, with one half of my brain tied behind my back.

President Trump made one error concerning humanitarian aid to Venezuela—the aid should be escorted by our military.  Mudaro is a socialist monster and must be removed for at least the crime of starving his people.  But this is nothing new—this practice has been done ever since we have attempted to bring aid to starving nations.  In most cases the food and medicine were left to rot on the docks—a fact left out of from those agencies, who were advertising for aid to these starving nations — the reason; to starve out the rebels who were forced to fight or die from starvation. 

Any humanitarian aid will never reach it's intended unless the politics of those nations are changed for the sake of human rights.  But of course, we understand that socialism must be maintained for the sake of every dictator, right?  There is no doubt in my mind that former President Obama was a practicing dictator, for whom both the Demoncrats and the Mainstream media agreed.  But of course, it is “the Powers That Be” who designed this “Matrix.” we occupy.

The Perversion of History

It is now a fact and not a simple practice, to encourage “Political Correctness” in everyday life, which includes all historical perspectives.  There is no doubt in my mind that Communism is very much alive, well, and has slowly crept into our higher institutions of learning; to such a degree that all history, whether true or not, has taken a backseat to progressive thinking. 

Progressive thinking is a warmer way of saying “embrace socialism.”  Communism is a form of socialism.  If one has studied how the former Soviet Union taught history in their schools; the same will quickly discover how the perversion of our history has captured the minds of our youth, in the same manner.

Captain Kirk had to admonish Ensign Chekov about history, and to further say to him, “Is all your history that flawed?”  We are all products of education.  If the education is flawed, so will be our thinking.  The same is true for doctors, for which their bias emanates from Big Pharma, who are the single largest contributors to all medical institutions worldwide.  The above is why doctors are quick to administer drugs and surgery, instead of considering a holistic approach, as was done in times past.

It will not be long before what Zager and Evans had predicted from their song titled, “In The Year 2525,” stating “Everything you think do and say, is in the pill you took today.”  We are not there yet, but as long as there are “free thinkers,” efforts will be made to develop mind control substances, such as fluoride added to our drinking water, for which the Nazis discovered, makes people docile.  Only one-third of the Nazi Germany population supported the Nazi regime.

Anyone can come up with their truth to any issue, for which that particular truth will stand, as long as there are a consensus agenda and narrative to support it.  Both the Demoncrats and the media have wittingly conspired to accomplish the socialism of America.  This act was never part of the American fabric; therefore the above accomplishment comes from an outside source, which has infiltrated every government and educational institution, to bring about the final demise of the greatest nation to ever exist, in all human history.  The outside source for which I am referring is “The Matrix.”

We have no one to blame but those who are willing accomplices, who unwittingly serve “The Matrix.,” who are amply rewarded for their service.  Even Satan rewards those who do his biddings, such as the many who work for Hollywood and the music industry.  Matthew 4:5-9; this scripture means that Satan owns all the kingdoms of the world, no matter the era—for he is the ruler of everything on the Earth.  Satan has no love for humanity because we exist to replace Satan, who used to serve God but rebelled, along with one-third of the angels, who are known as demons.

It seems like a paradox that Satan rewards his servants and hates humanity all at the same time.  But one must understand that Satan has deceived the world of his existence, so we quickly dismiss a so-called “fallacy” of an evil force.  Satan is hidden from all works of evil, so we place blame on guns and not the person(s) who commit works of evil, which cause death and destruction; allowing them to live in prison when they all should be buried as were their victims.  As long as we allow evil to live, evil works will continue to flourish.  A sentence of death has always been a deterrent to works of evil.  So instead of mowing down invaders from the south, we let them in, which nullifies our immigration laws.

The Constitution is very clear as to who is responsible for immigration—“Article I, Section 8, Clause 15—it is Congress who is responsible for immigration.  But when Congress is derelict in their duty; the responsibility falls upon the President of the United States, for which President Trump has done, and the courts have no authority or power to stop him.  If indeed the courts had such power and authority, then the courts would have stopped Lincoln from taking unilateral action, for the protection of Federal Property, and signed the “Emergency War Powers Act.”

The action President Trump took against an inept Congress, is to protect American lives and property.  This action was taken too late for the 4000 plus American lives that were lost, and the suffering of the families who are now burdened with their losses.  In my opinion, President Trump was far too generous towards Congress, as were the media.  Up to 150 countries are represented in the caravans that are moving northward—why—because of our inept immigration laws, and lack of enforcement of the laws we do have.

A Law that Legalizes Murder

The Stakes could never be higher for the unborn.  And now the “Left” has raised the ante, which is something of a dare to attempt to stop them.  New York State has set a new tone for abortions, for which it is now lawful to perform an outright murder of a child immediately after birth.  However, there are Federal Laws in place to protect children, for which that protection can go as far as a judge ordering a child forced into cancer treatment.   

The addition of murdering a child soon after birth goes against the edict and authority of “Child Protective Services,” for which the authority of this agency comes from the “Mariage License.”  I know, this is not what one would expect, but is entirely true.  Marriage licensing was first instituted in 1968, which immediately followed the re-organization of the United States that was caused by the protest of the “Slave States.,” whose legislative representatives did not show up as per “Article I, Section 4 and clause 2” of our Constitution, which was a threat of those same “Slave States,” if Lincoln was elected.  Therefore, at least in theory, the “Republic of the United States” was dissolved, and was re-organized as I stated above, into the “Corporation of the United States.” 

Despite the above, it is necessary to go back to origins, otherwise all understanding as to “why,” would be lost, for this is why we should study in depth; history, but not the history as re-written as per the “Liberal Agenda.,” but history as written from the contemporaries of those who lived in that venue.  State-sponsored education is all about shaping and forming a society as the government views it.  When the “Liberals” are in charge—they will purposely omit whatever does not fit their narrative, with the addition of applying “political correctness.”  It has been 23 years since the “Los Angeles Times” first instituted “political correctness,” which means one young generation has passed, most likely not knowing the origin of “political correctness,” and never questioned where it originated.  I am sorry to say this same mentioned generation is ignorant of something they are espousing.

Also, as a matter of being “legal,” we were numbered by the FDR Administration, along with our name in all capital letters, for which is a “legal fiction,” or corporation, for which a corporation has no rights—for this is the reason we are subjected to “Contract Law,” such as the “Marriage License.”  Everyone who receives any document from the government and in many cases from some commercial enterprises, such as banks, will always render our names in all capital letters, which is addressing the “legal fiction,” or “corporation.”

The above caught me by surprise, because now, by law, the woman carrying the child now can decide whether or not the child lives or dies.  However, in what I just described above, it is by “contract law” that children are wards of the “State,” for which it is the “State” that makes such decisions, for which “Child Protective Services” should be involved.  However, there is just one more letter of the law that prevents the above from happening—it is the “Birth Certificate,” for which this is the document that warehouses us into “human resources,” and the “Death Certificate” removes us from the “human resources” inventory.  Yes, my friends, we are bought and sold on the market as slaves, for this is why our signature is worth billions of dollars, for which we receive a minuscule share.

So it seems that the birth mother can make a “life and death” decision for the newborn child, because there is no “Birth Certificate,” and therefore no “legal fiction” or “corporation” can be added to the “human resources” inventory. 

As dark as the above might be, there is a much darker side to the new law of “legalized murder,” which actually should not be so surprising because of some states that allow euthanizing, for which I somewhat agree, but for one personal reason—I would rather be dead than be a victim of our technology.  Yes, technology can save lives, but also prolong life in a vegetative state, for which if it is within my power not to be imperiled by the technical prowess of sustaining a useless life, DNR.

The Darker Side of the New Law

Upon doing research, I discovered disturbing practices that date back to ancient times and at the very least metaphorically taking place now.  The song is the same but played in a different tune.  I am referring to the practice of “child sacrifice.”  Ancient history is rife with the practice of sacrificing children to so-called “appease a deity.” 

In the country of Uganda, children are routinely kidnapped, dismembered and included in rituals of witchcraft.  Kidnappers are paid $1400 for each child.  The practice carries the death penalty, but few are convicted.  Despite the superstitions of places like Uganda, this same practice of “child sacrifice” is practiced in Europe as well as in the United States.  So as one can see, sex is not the only reason as to why our children are kidnapped. 

Also, we need to question as to how these new-born sacrifices are being disposed of and probably sold, such as when a hidden camera exposed the buying and selling of fetuses from “Planned Parenthood.”  Is it possible, that this new law is designed for the specific purpose of allowing a child to be born for an unknown market?  

Health Care for Everyone?

Heath care for everyone has now become the premiere platform of the Demoncratic Party.  Let’s assume for just one moment that the Demoncrats succeed in getting the legislation needed.  The cheers would be deafening but at the end of the day will be a reality check, for which I have already touted in a prior blog. 

Here are the sad facts…

·        When the ACA became law, it was not too long after that over 16 million people lost their health care coverage.  Yes, I know that 11 million policies were dropped, but what the media did not tell you is that one policy covered up to 4 people.

·        Hospitals that did not rely upon government subsidies closed their doors—this happened in mostly rural areas, for which many patients had to commute more than one hour to get to a hospital.

·        Many doctors quit their profession because of the government regulations significantly reduced the amount of money a doctor received for his or her services, which also resonated with medical students at that time, and dropped their medical studies.  The above is just one reason we have a deficit of more than 20,000 doctors nationwide.

·        Open up the employment section of any local newspaper and view the plethora of display ads, in a desperate attempt to find nurses and technicians for the medical industry.

·        Yes, “You can keep your plan and keep your doctor,” but conveniently left out ‘if you can afford it.’  And in some cases, the premiums exceeded over one-hundred percent.  Obama was covered, and so were those who touted the ACA, who were exempt from the ACA, and had Cadillac coverage.

·        With the current costs of health care, and applying health care for everyone at this very moment, will most certainly exceed the military budget.  The key here is, “Who is going to pay for it?”  Anyone who had complained about their paychecks and the consequential government grab for a “piece of the action,” before President Trump provided some great relief, are going to discover half their pay is going to pay for “Health Care for Everyone.”

·        The “Federal Mandate” for the ACA that was to take place in 2017 was to be the final nail in the coffin for every American worker, for which would come under the jurisdiction of the “Instant Rip-off Service,” or more commonly known as the “IRS.”  The above means that the financing for the ACA would be deducted from all paychecks;  “Medicare for Everyone” will most certainly accomplish this, because it will be a single-payer, government-sponsored system.

·        The appalling thing that Obama did to kick-start the ACA was to rob Medicare of 900 million dollars to fund the ACA.  Who or what is going to ‘take the hit’ when “Medicare for Everyone” takes place?  Oh yes, when Obama robbed Medicare, some once enjoyed benefits were lost forever—this was a big hit on our senior citizens.

·        The ACA did one more thing that should infuriate most people.  Obama had meetings with health care insurers before the ACA was passed, but the context of those meetings did not surface until it was too late.  It was the way it surfaced when the financial reports were made known publically about the health care insurer’s profits—their profits went from 8 billion per year to 15 billion per year.  Now, where does one think that money came from—the taxpayers, of course.

The above kind of Socialism has been both tried and failed in several countries before us.  It is impossible to have viable paid health care for everyone.  The shortage of doctors, nurses, technicians, and other health care support personnel is enough all by itself to end the debate.  Okay, have “Medicare for Everyone.” And watch the health of nearly everyone fail dramatically…why…with all the shortages of medical personnel, all health care recipients would be hard-pressed to secure a timely appointment.  As laudable as providing health care for everyone is, this issue has not been well thought out on the part of the Demoncrats.  And the media is just as reckless for this support.

President Trump Body Slams Nancy Pelosi; War in the Middle East

I see some in the media who are wincing as to what President Trump did to Pelosi and company.  Yes, I was openly disappointed in my prior blog, but I suppose when President Trump grounded a demoncratic brat, is a close second to what he missed the last week.  There is no doubt that both the House Majority leader and the President have engaged in “trench warfare,” for which neither will jeopardize their positions. 

Lindsey Graham complained about how “sophomoric” both Pelosi and Trump are behaving, for which one tweet described it as a Nah, Nah, Poo, Poo politicing.  All this political bickering is going nowhere, but this is Washington D.C., for which is a metaphoric “swamp,” and swamps don’t move very much. 

The only action that has made any difference in Washington, D.C., is President Trump pen.  Every one of President Trump’s “actions” has done nothing less than positive effects; massive employment, for which there are now more jobs than people to fill them, and at least 24 other positives that have boosted our economy.  According to former President Obama, when touting; “What magic wand will Trump wave,” President Trump has achieved the impossible by bringing manufacturing back to the United States.  If any country is not exporting; eventually that particular nation has closed the book on growth. 

Capitalism, in short, is, “Find a need and fill it.”  The United States was for a time, a republic.  However, an almost unnoticed number of events took place within our government, in the latter half of the 19^th century, for which our nation transformed from a republic to a democracy.  In a democracy, a government finds a way to tax the economy.  As a “Republic” the United States government was financed through tariffs.  The individual income tax is a form of slavery.  Consider; how long does one work to pay the income tax; 3 to 4 months out of the year perhaps?  The translation is to be from one quarter to one-third a “slave.”

In early America, Americans did not take too kindly to being taxed and receiving no benefits; most of all, without representation.  Britain was rather busy prosecuting wars, with either France or Spain, and money is the grease that lubricates a military machine.  Today, this is known as the “Military Industrial Complex.”  We already know what proceeded after that, which is not unlike the workings of the Instant Rip-off Service, when they feel they are short-changed.  Yes, the IRS has sent military people out to not only confiscate but also to prosecute. 

The recent attack in Syria that killed a few Americans was no coincidence, in regards to the timing—this particular attack came almost immediately after President Trump’s announcement of pulling our troops out of Syria.  This particular attack was not a response from ISIS but was a response from the “Military Industrial Complex,” who prompted the opposition to make this attack happen.  Remember what I have written in a prior blog—“If there were no profit in war there would be less of it.”  Before the “Military Industrial Complex,” wars were far shorter than they have been since after North Korea.  Endless wars, fill the coffers of the “Military Industrial Complex,” endlessly.  Yes, we need the military, but not to be engaged in wars to profit the few.

The key to the defunding of the “Military Industrial Complex,” is to make it illegal for any legislature to have investments in any company that produces or provides material to make military equipment.  Another venue would be for any owner and workers employed in the manufacture of military equipment and supplies, to pay them no more than those who are willing to spill their blood.  I said it before, and it bears repeating; we do not have any business to be involved in another’s civil war or to be actively involved in changing a regime.  In addition, if Muslims are not fighting their enemies, they are still engaged in killing one another. 

To qualify this last statement about the Muslims, to wit: Genesis 16:1-12, Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had a handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.

2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.

3 And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.

4 And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.

5 And Sarai said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes: the LORD judge between me and thee.

6 But Abram said unto Sarai, Behold, thy maid is in thy hand; do to her as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled from her face.

7 And the angel of the LORD found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur.

8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai's maid, whence camest thou? and whither wilt thou go? And she said, I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai.

9 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.

10 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.

11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.

12 And he will be a wild man*; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

*Some translations give the following description, “a wild ass of a man.”  Therefore it is of no surprise as to what transpires in regards to Muslims, for which if they do not assimilate into the American society, they will cause much havoc within our nation, for which they have already gained allies in the courts and our political system.

President Trump Missed a Pivotal Opportunity…

As much as I support President Trump in getting the wall, I am rather disappointed he missed a valuable political opportunity that both the MSM and the Demoncrats would never forget.  It would have been the greatest “sweet revenge” for all the heartache to the “Angel Families” who lost loved ones.

President Trump should have announced, at the same time when the wheels of the private jet hit the tarmac of the airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico, to declare a “National Emergency.” to get his wall funded.  The news would most certainly be on the monitors of the lobby of the airport, when both the Demoncrats and the lobbyists who most likely funded the junket, would have their jaws drop to the floor, as they disembarked, and completely spoil the bribe. 

Also, President Trump could have announced that he would not sign anything to fund Puerto Rico’s financial mismanagement further—this would be salt to rub deeply into the wound.  One of the reasons for this particular junket was to lobby for more funding for Puerto Rico.  There is no doubt that the tens of thousands of dollars the lobbyists invested for the flight, rental cars, hotels and probably the “Hamilton Show,” would be miffed beyond belief.  

The above would have been a paradox for the Demoncrats, as to what to do next.  They could reach into their deep corrupt pockets and get a return flight back to Washington, or make a noble attempt to enjoy themselves through the generosity of their hosts.  Oh, my dear President Trump—my hands are in my face because you lost a political opportunity that would have been well-remembered in the history books.  One can only hope that you might have something else in mind, but alas, I strongly feel that you have been far too generous with these venomous Demoncrats.

The 2020 Demoncratic Platform in Two Words

HATE TRUMP…

It seems that no matter if President Trump turns to the right or to the left, he can do nothing correctly according to both the Demoncrats and the Mainstream Media (MSM).  Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign was also about resisting Trump at every turn but did not have any other issue, with the exception of the usual political platitudes.

Is it possible that hating any white person is not a “Hate Crime?”  So-called “Hate Crimes” are not crimes, unless there is a constitutionally injured party.  “Hate Crimes” stem from the mind and come out of the mouth.  There are no weapons involved that can physically induce harm, requiring medical attention. 

There is much talk about “equity in law”, or “equal protection of the laws” but does anyone who touts this particular phrase, fully understand what it means?  According to a law dictionary, authored by Steven H. Gifis, states the following under the word “equity”, to wit: most generally “justice.”  Historically, “equity” developed as a separate body of law in England in reaction to the inability of the common law courts, in their strict adherence to rigid writs and forms of action to entertain or provide a remedy for every injury.  The King, therefore, established the high court of chancery, the purpose of which was to do justice between parties in those cases where the common law would give no or inadequate redress.  Equity law to a large extent was formulated in maxims, such as “equity suffers not a right without a remedy,” or “equity follows the law,” meaning that equity will derive a means to achieve a lawful result when legal procedure is inadequate.  Equity and law are no longer bifurcated but are now merged in most jurisdictions, though equity jurisprudence and equitable doctrines are still independently viable. See 29 N.Y.S. 342, 343, 6 N.Y.S. 2d 720, 721, 293 F. 633, 637.

Equity in law cannot survive the magnification of so-called “rights” of special interest groups—this by itself offers nothing more than “private law(s)” that are narrowly defined within those groups, such as women’s groups or LGBTQ persons, who are de-natured by choice, and fully expect to be protected by “special laws” also known as “hate crimes,” for which any rejections of those from outside those groups can easily be construed as “hate crimes.” 

It is quite a comedy when relatives are gathered together within a family, and in most cases, it is the hostess who sets the places at a table of who is going to be seated where.  This behavior is precisely what special interest groups are experiencing when they expect to be protected.  The point is that laws that define a hate crime are never founded in equity.  The hostess who is setting the table can be likened to a judge, who is doling out judgments according to one’s situation to the one seated next to them.

Now comes the fun part—when an incident occurs within this table setting, will determine the seating arrangement at the next family gathering—this can also be applied to the rights of those within special interest groups, who upon an incident will be in a different place when another incident takes place that is construed as a “hate crime.” As long as we abandon “equal protection of the laws” and opt for special laws—it will be a never-ending of layer upon layer of laws, for which there will never be any justice.  “The more laws the less justice.” Thomas Jefferson 

By the way… “racism” is not a crime, but there is an extreme school of thought that has purported this idea and is being touted by both politicians and the MSM.  “Racism” is a morality issue, in other words, “a choice” and not a matter of law.  We can choose to be hateful or likable.  Let me give you a personal example; I was employed by a male gay couple, to do work on their house.  They have an RV that they allowed me to dwell in during my employment.  I was well aware of their living situation prior to me being hired, for which I had no problem with their chosen lifestyle, even though their practice is unnatural.  However, I am not sitting in the judgment seat and have accepted their choice because that is their right to make that choice, and I respect that choice even though I do not agree with it.

I could have easily have refused to do business with them, and I have that right to make that choice—it is not “racism” or a “hate crime,” if I have chosen not to do business with them.  The exact same thing is true with a baker who refuses to bake a cake for a gay couple.  What is happening in such cases is action is forced upon someone to produce or sue can also be construed as a “hate crime” against the gay couple, who are practicing the unlawful act of extortion.  The above is what is meant by “equal protection of the laws.”  The law must apply to everyone, or it means nothing.