Who Will Be the New FBI Director?

And the sixty-four thousand dollar question is… “Who will be the new FBI Director?”  Well, here we go again with at least a 2 ring circus of the media and the demoncrats.  Okay, a 3 or 4 ring circus if you want to include the Justice Department and the Senate Judiciary Committee.  The bias media simply cannot help themselves, but to continue their badgering of their favorite subject, who they wish was never their favorite subject, or perhaps should be thankful that because Donald Trump was elected President still have their jobs?  Oh yes, we cannot forget the comedians, who should also be thankful they have material for their political rants, as “dark” as they may be.  

Apparently there are 8 people on the “short list” for a possible pick.  I do not know why McCabe is on that list, because he is a political hack, possible leaker and way too close to the Clintons.  Mike Rogers, the current head of the NSA would not be my choice either, because he believes in spying on all Americans and I do not believe a judge would be good pick, without properly vetting them when they were prosecutors.  The others I am not familiar, nor have I ever heard of them until now.  What is needed is a near impeccable law enforcement officer, with strong administrative abilities, a motivator and one who will not be an overt public grandstander.  It is quite possible that none of those on the current “short list” will be President Trump’s pick. 

And then of course, the media has to corner President Trump and ask him if he will pick a new director before he takes his trip to the Middle East this coming Wednesday.  At the moment, I personally do not see that happening, but of course the news will proliferate the air and ignore much of some of the more important news items, such as I stated in a prior blog.  The “Trump/Russian narrative” is a non-sequitur, for the simple reason that there is not a shred of evidence to support that narrative, for which assigning a prosecutor is a moot argument and therefore no grand jury can be assembled.  Anyone who states otherwise is talking out of their backside.  Much of my research in more than the past 20 years, has been about law and can back up anything I say, in reference to cases I wish to comment. 

Yes, there is evidence that the Russians did to a small degree interfere with the elections, but it was clearly stated by three of our top security agencies that “interference” did not have an effect on the outcome.  However, there is much more evidence as to the “election fraud” that did occur in places like Detroit and southern Texas, but the media does not want to tout or demand an investigation, because it does not fit the narrative.  The media is just as upset about Trump election as Hitlary and the rest of the demoncrats.  Oh yes, a poll was taken last week in New York City, if Hitlary should stay in the public eye or go back into the woods.  Everyone that I heard, said that Hitlary should go back into the woods.  One even stated she should go into the desert.  It is possible that those who support Hitlary were edited out from that particular poll that was taken by Jeanne Piro.  However, I have heard other prior polls that gave both sides and can hardly believe that this particular news agency would stray from their “fair and balanced” approach and for the sake of being objective did allow myself to be a “Devil’s advocate” in one of the above statements.  And yes, on occasion I will “play” with an issue when the time is ripe to tickle my readers.  Actually, I prefer to tickle my readers as much as possible, because all humor has its basis in truth and a “false narrative” joke will always become a “dark victory”.    

There is also some rather interesting news that is going to irk the media big time and that news is President Trump’s threat of shutting down the White House Press Briefings.  I like what one commentator stated when he said, “Trump did this in order to get a reaction from the press.”  I am quite sure that there will be at least 2 or 3 articles in the New York Times tomorrow and will slam President Trump very hard on this “time ordered tradition” that is about 100 years old.  President Trump also had a remedy at the same time he made this threat; to have a “White House Press Conference” every two weeks with President Trump speaking.  The daily briefings would be un-cryptic written statements handed out to the Press Corps.  

From the brouhaha I have heard from some media pundits; this threat may not become a reality.  However, I can fully understand why President Trump would do such a thing, only because the “Press Corps” deserves some discipline for all their baseless ranting that started from the day Donald Trump threw his hat in the ring and continues day after day, because of their unbelief that this “off the wall” candidate trumped the entire establishment on every side of the political spectrum.  Personally, I would probably do the same thing and actually carry out that threat, until such time the “Press Corps” decides that it is time to take President Trump seriously and revert back to their time honored tradition of being unbiased reporters, without the baseless narratives and bias commentary.