Addendum for the Day... A Commentary to the "Blaze", a news organization

Dear Readers of this blog; I not only write this blog, but also provide commentary to the various news organizations, when reading their articles.  Below is one such recent commentary in response to an article about some demoncrat, who decided to make an a** out of himself about guns and that shooter in Alexandria, Virginia.  It is probably my longest commentary I have ever made to any one particular news organization and much of this and more can also be found in my book titled, “What Difference Does It Make?!”

To Wit:

What part of the Second Amendment do people not understand?  Our Forefathers were quite aware of the need to be armed, for the express purpose to be able to defend ourselves from murderers raving maniacs and the mentally disturbed.  Did you get that?  If you did not, then you are blind, dumb or just plain stupid.  The problem was never a “gun issue”… it was always a “people issue”, who possessed deadly weapons.  A weapon is only deadly in the hands of those who have intentions of doing harm, not the person who simply wants to provide a degree of protection and the Second Amendment provides that plain and simple, which also means there are no encumbrances attached to the ownership of any weapon technology can provide; exempting weapons of mass destruction. 

With that said, our Forefathers also fully understood that government can and ultimately do, will eventually morph into tyrannical tendencies, for which Thomas Jefferson stated: “When one cannot get redress in the courts, then it is time to take up arms.”  This simply means that when proper justice is not rendered, when it is the force of government taking action that threatens our “God-given Rights”, we have the absolute “Right” to arm ourselves and aim in the direction of the oppressors.  There are times when looking into the barrel of a gun that has a general tendency to change minds, especially toward those in power.

This is also why we have a “jury system” in our courts, in order to quell laws from trampling upon our “God-given Rights”.  This means it is incumbent upon our judges to behave in a manner consistent within the framework of the document they had sworn an oath to both protect and defend.  When a judge misbehaves on the bench, we can remove them and I am a witness to such a time when this did happen in Albuquerque, New-Mexico back in 2000.  You did not hear about this?  Be prepared to be stunned.  

There was a group of us who were pro-se, meaning defending ourselves in court, without an attorney.  One in our group was brought into court and some others in our group also attended this court session.  Every time the judge misbehaved, notes were taken whenever constitutional violations were taking place.  From what I understand there were at least 20 different violations and then those notes were sent to the “Judicial Standards Commission”.  Needless to say Judge Barbara Brown was subsequently removed from the bench.  The Media knew about this, but they were told lies about the reasons for the removal, only because if the truth were known, it would cause a serious judicial upheaval in every court in the nation.  Therefore, only a mere handful of us knew the truth.