Syrian Civil War

James 4:1 From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?  It might be well with my readers to view an old “Star Trek” episode titled; “A Taste of Armageddon”, and pay close attention to near the end when “Anon 7” pleads with “Captain Kirk”, as to the horrors of an actual protracted war, compared to a so-called “solution”, by waging war with computers and herding mathematically proclaimed “casualties” into suicide chambers.  If we want to tout the benefits of A.I., we might want to take a more magnified look at this prospect of control over our lives.  In addition, we might also carefully consider the touting of so-called, “climate change”, for which “human-caused” climate change might prompt the authorities to consider a scenario, as depicted in the movie “Logan’s Run”.

If wars were not planned, as every government around the world says, “Wars are a form of population control,” for which there is some truth in that statement.  The same could be said for abortion, but most abortions are taking place here in the United States, in order to slow down a “free thinking population”, and import a more easily controlled population from third world nations, who will gladly give up whatever freedoms they may have had, if we were a true nation of freedom, like we once were, but that ended in 1868.  However, no one told these aliens of the impending totalitarian takeover of the United States, by first establishing a socialist agenda, which is allowing more and more people into the United States, all without proper protocol and adding more crimes against American citizens, for which the Liberals are touting the elimination of “white men”.

Despite the above, we need to understand the United States has absolutely no business to assist or interfere in another’s “civil war”.  All one needed to do when viewing the masses of refugees fleeing Syria; imagine if you will, all the refugee men, if armed, could go back and reclaim what was once their’s. There are international laws in place that are designed to quell “chemical warfare”, for which the United Nations took no action, but President Trump was not shy about doing something about it, and there was very little resistance to this venue.  When a child’s spirit is one of rebellion; it does no harm to give that child a spanking in order to break that spirit.  It does no harm to the backside, for you cannot break it, because it is already split.

Now that “Isis” is under control in Syria; it is now up to the Syrian people to take full control over their own land.  Our armed forces are not for sale or prosecutors of another’s civil war.  As President Trump plainly and rightly stated, “We are not the world’s policeman.”  If a nation wants to embrace a democratic form of government—they need no help from us.  We are the example, but as it stands now; we are not to be emulated, until such time we take all the profit out of a war, for which was expounded by Major General Smedley Darlington Butler in a speech he made on or about 1932.  In addition, we are not in a proxy war against the Russians.  The Russians have their own problems at home, and this war is a distraction for the Russian people focusing upon the depressed economy of Russia. 

Without a doubt, there is much profit to be made in the prosecution of a war, and even more profit for those who produce the armaments.  J.P. Morgan knew this and was privy to the plans of the “Banksters” of a war they were planning for Europe, in order to remove the “crowned heads of Europe”.  So it was in 1903 that J.P. Morgan purchased Andrew Carnegie’s steel business, for which would be a primary supplier to both sides of the warring factions and reap tremendous profits.  The DuPont family was also well aware of the profit of war, which set up factories in early America for the manufacture of gunpowder.  All major wars since 1700 were all planned; the DuPont family knew it and so did J.P. Morgan and his banker backers. 

Washington D.C. is awash with money, for which many lobbyists are hired to peddle influence among our legislatures, which is the reason why our elected representatives no longer answer to their constituents back in their home States.  It is money, power and greed that makes up “The Swamp” that President Trump refers to be in process of draining.  I stated in one of my blogs when President Trump was just days in office that “draining the Swamp” is going to prove to be a daunting task.  I must say that the Mueller investigation has promulgated some media investigation to the “creatures of the Swamp”, who are the leftovers from the Obama Administration, and operating as if Obama were still in charge—perhaps he still is…? 

Many of these “swamp creatures” rear up their heads and the mallet is posed to knocking them down into their “rabbit holes”, only to pop up again someplace else.  These people seem to have the same immunity, for which I referred about Hitlary Clinton more than 3 years prior to now.  And again as I stated in a prior blog; “…the swamp is much deeper and murkier than President Trump perceives.  My hope is that President Trump might be likened to a “political transformer”, and pulls out his bag of the same kind of dirty tricks the “Demoncrats” practice.  With the “Demoncratic majority of the House of Representatives” poised to take place in January; President Trump is going to need a lot of help and support that he is not getting presently.

What are a Republic and a Democracy? A short blog at the end about health care

We as Americans should be incensed at the behavior of the workings our current government; for which does not reflect or expound the context of our Constitution.  Benjamin Franklyn was quite succinct when he and the others, finally emerged from the hammering out of what has to be the greatest document for the benefit of “We the People” and answered a question from those outside who were waiting for what had transpired; to wit: “You now have a republic if you can keep it.”  Not too long after the Civil War had ended; our republic was changed to a “democracy”; for which a “democracy” is quite different from a “republic”.

The “democracy” that was created has morphed throughout one century, into “socialism”; for which the stake in the heart was promulgated by FDR, and was the beginning of what should be called “the fourth branch of our government, a bureaucracy.”  Any “bureaucracy” is government control, and in this case, it is “Federal control,” for which requires a standard of revenue that can be relied upon for its life and continued growth.  Enter the “Instant Rip-off Service,” or more commonly known as the IRS.  We may have a constitutional amendment that gives breath and life to the IRS, but it was not properly enacted.  As they say, “the devil is in the details,” that can be found in my book titled, “What Difference Does It Make?!”  

The United States bureaucracies have a built-in, systemic edict of an increase in growth every year, which is why we have an ever-increasing “national debt” that will never be repaid, and the very reason why the cost of government is having a negative effect upon our economy and will continue to do so.  This is one particular reason why the “Demoncrats” were livid about President Trump’s tax reform.  Less money for the government simply means more money through both the front and back door of every American.  A lesser burden directly affecting the individual taxpayer is just one benefit.  Another benefit that indirectly affects the entire economy is the tax cut for business.  This was a reverse “double whammy” that was the vaccination of money we hard-working Americans deserved for a very long time.  Also, was President Trump’s basement door of cutting regulations is another that has effectively helped the entire nation to become more competitive in a global market.

Socialism demands more government control, which is merely a subtle form of slavery.  In reality, the “14^th Amendment” changed the ownership of the slaves to the Federal Government, but also enslaved everyone else who is a “U.S. citizen.”  When we were a “republic,” we were “Citizens” of our respective States.  Anyone who has just read the above sentence might want to reread it with a more critical eye and find a distinct difference of a specific word mentioned twice… The difference is what defines an individual as either a slave or a free person.  Words and their meanings are quite acute whenever the law is involved; this includes the capitalization of words and gives more meaning to when it is stated about any legal document of “crossing T’s and dotting I’s.  It is these subtleties that excite me about the study of law.  It is said “knowledge is power,” but this does not quite ring true, especially when dealing with matters and points of law.  That particular quote should be rendered; “the right knowledge is power.”

When reading my book, “What Difference Does It Make?!”… might be a rather daunting task, but I have worded it to give the ignorant reader at the very least a rudimentary understanding of the law.  When I just stated, “ignorant reader” that is not an insult, or even in the slightest an offense.  I was at one time just as ignorant of the law as any other person who would rather refer those matters to the attorneys they hire.  I must apologize for the following, but those who hire an attorney have already declared themselves incompetent.  Just so many of my readers of this blog are in good company; “the Book of Romans” is a study of law, for which is quite probably the most difficult book to read in our Bibles.  And yes, even though I am quite well educated in matters of law; I also find this particular book a rather difficult read.  Paul was a very complex and well-educated person, as well as passionate about his beliefs when he at first was persecuting converts.  Paul’s conversion was quite dramatic, for which he was humbled.  It rather tickles me that God could be considered a “drama queen.”  Oh, come on… God is no prude, and he could deliver well-deserved insults as well as admonishments.  It is not a sin to be a “drama queen.”   

We have another looming problem that the Demoncrats have every intention of grabbing the bull by the horns, and that is upholding ObamaCare.  The teeth of ObamaCare that so-called, “was declared as being constitutional by Chief Justice Roberts” was eliminated by the Trump Administration; and now a Federal Judge has declared what is left of ObamaCare as “unconstitutional,” and rightly so.  There actually more to this than meets the eye, only because of it's so-called, “points of law.”  I have written about this before, but just as some Biblical scripture bears repeating, so will I repeat what I have prominently blogged before.  ObamaCare was declared as, “the law of the land,” but from a pure standpoint of law that was never true, because any “law of the land” is a “Constitutional Amendment.”  

Obama and the Demoncrats simply had no patience to assemble a “Constitutional Convention.”  They knew this would never fly, only because all the truth of this particular Amendment would become well-known, and there would be no secrets.

Also, anything that requires a “signature” is a contract, for which anyone signing up for ObamaCare has entered into a government contract.  Your driver’s license is a government contract because your signature is required to make the contract valid.  Despite our “Right to Travel,” in regards to the licensing of drivers, this is an entirely different subject that I have also expounded previously.  Actually, the “Affordable Care Act” is an adhesion contract, as is the driver’s license, because they can stick anything they want onto it, and it then becomes instantly retroactive universally.  This is specifically why they saved the “Individual Mandate” to be implemented down the road, for which you would discover upon the implementation of the “Individual Mandate”, an additional deduction from your paycheck, for this was the coup de ta’ to make ObamaCare a single payer system, for which they apparently had in mind all along. 

What did I say in a recent prior blog about a universal health care system?  We currently have a deficit of 20,000 doctors nationwide.  Therefore, what will be the immediate effect of this system of health care?  Two words will become the byword of ObamaCare; “Rationed Care”, for which the health cares of millions of Americans, will plummet, within the first year.

Health Care is not a “Constitutional Right”, whether or not it is taxed.  The Supreme Court is not at all times “supreme” in their behavior.  The Supreme Court is not as laudable as it once was and is clearly divided within party lines.  Not until such time will I ever give my complete credence to the Supreme Court, unless they adhere one-hundred percent of the time to our “Constitution”, which includes “The Bill of Rights”, unfettered!

Health care is a matter of choice.  If your diet consists of fast-food or what I call a “policeman’s lunch”, coffee and a donut; what do you think will happen to your individual health care?  If you are eating junk, you will feel like junk.  There are simply too many choices of foods available that are not designed to be nutritious; not to mention the toxic ingredients in all processed so-called, “foods”.  Some of those “snack foods” contain specific ingredients that are designed to make you eat more of it.  “If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”  Thomas Jefferson

The Border Wall

“Smile, you’re on Candid Camera”… President Trump invited both Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to the White House yesterday; to discuss getting the money to complete the border wall.  Whenever President Trump wants something he will attempt to make a deal; which is how Washington D.C. works all the time.  However, neither Schumer nor Pelosi were in the disposition to give President Trump anything, no matter how small.  Prior to this; Pelosi was asked by a reporter if she would support a bill for the wall—she was not shy when she said “Nope; it would be immoral.”  Excuse me, but what is “immoral” about a wall that defines our border?  It is quite apparent that Pelosi and her Demoncrats colleagues have no inclination of putting up any kind of barrier, to protect us from an invasion.  Well, excuse me again, but did not Pelosi and everyone else who sits in our legislature in Washington, D.C., taken an oath to both protect and defend our Constitution?

For example; Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, to wit: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repeal Invasions.”  Since Congress has been so inept in their duty; President Trump has the authority to act, based upon the above citing from our Constitution, to act accordingly, for which he has done by sending a military contingent to repel an impending invasion.  Do any of my readers know of a change that has taken place based upon “Article I, Section 8, and Clause 15?”  Therefore, a border wall is 100 percent lawful, in order to protect our border and its citizens who reside within that border. 

There is no doubt that both Pelosi and Schumer were quite uncomfortable sitting there denying any money for the border, while the cameras were on.  Schumer could not look President Trump in the eye and wanted the cameras to leave.  President Trump was not shy about taking the blame this time, for shutting down the government.  President Trump made a campaign promise to put up a border wall, and has done his level best to doing something about it, even if only a few miles got completed.  The only wall that really needs to be taken down—is the wall the Demoncrats have put up as not to be breached.  It seems to me that since the politicians cannot lawfully duke it out; then it is up to the voters to take matters into their own hands.  Hopefully, President Trump may see this as an opportunity to bring the entire matter to the American People; such as Ronald Reagan had done.

I was quite pleased when President Trump put out a “tweet”; citing the 150 billion Obama gave away to Iran, without so much as a whimper, and got absolutely nothing for that payment.  President Trump was only asking for a mere 5 billion dollars for the wall, but we can clearly see what we are getting for our money, so can those who would dare to breach it.  The bottom line is—the Demoncrats don’t want to give President Trump a “win”.  However, at the same time, the Demoncrats are just showing off the asses they are by continuing this denial, and abrogating their “oath of office”.  By stark contrast, if there were a Demoncrat sitting in the Oval Office, such as Obama, for they did not deny Obama anything he wanted; for which the Demoncrats had no problem with all that spending and accrued debt.  Back in 2006, both the Republicans and the Democrats were all for a border wall.  What can we say? Politics breeds strange bedfellows; short-lived affairs, and the beat goes on.

My compliments to Orin Hatch, who is retiring after his final session with his 40 years with the Senate—thank you for your long-time service to our country, and don’t be a stranger.  Paul Ryan is also retiring from the Legislature—although he has served, I believe he was a kind of “stealth elite”, among the Republicans. 

The Demoncratic Gloat Fest

The Demoncrats have poised themselves for a coming January session of “What can we do today to get President Trump impeached?”  Apparently, the House Demoncrats will take over where Mueller left off, or take up the slack he left behind.  I dare say that if Mueller and 15 loyal attorneys could not take President Trump down—do the House Demoncrats really believe they can?  One might suppose this might be possible if 219 Representatives devote full time to this end.  However, they will at the same time be abrogating their oath of office to getting to the job they were elected to do; and that is tending to the nation’s business, but one can also suppose that it is the job of the Demoncrats to remove President Trump from office, via a bloodless, political coup.

Consider the $30 million dollars that could have been earmarked for something other than doing a “Witch Hunt”.  At first, it was the presumption of “colluding with the Russians, to secure Trump’s election bid.”  Have I got that right?  However, since there was never any evidence pointing in that direction; Mueller decided to trim the branches of those involved in Trump’s presidential campaign; in the hopes to affect the taking down of the entire tree.  Although Mueller had implicated at least 13 Russians in the so-called “collusion”; it is virtually impossible to subpoena them as witnesses.

Now the Demoncrats have a problem, and that is the up and coming vote for the annual budget.  President Trump erred the last time, only because he needed money to rebuild the military that Obama allowed falling by the wayside.  Obama had other things in mind; such as funneling money to many various liberal groups and enabling illegal immigrants to have their hands unfettered into the “government cookie jar”.  This is clearly one reason why the “National Debt” doubled during the entire 8 years of the Obama Administration.  Another reason is the hundreds of millions of dollars spent for trips around the world to offer an apology for American’s so-called “imperialism”.  Not to mention his time off for golf, and we the taxpayers paid for all if it.  President Trump by stark contrast has only been on a golf course about twice in the past 2 years.  And I dare say, President Trump has been more watchful about spending taxpayer dollars.  Apparently, President Obama had allowed himself (being black) “reparations”.

Before Obama left office, he was very slick when delegating to those who are implicated in leaking and unmasking.  Obama carefully gave orders to numbers of senior and junior staffers, which gave them autonomy, for whatever action(s) were taken.  In this way, Obama was able to keep his skirts starched clean.  Not unlike “Slick Willy”, who stained a dress of an intern.

Hillary, by stark contrast would not give as much autonomy to her staffers—but for one systemic reason of a peculiarity of her gender—to have complete control, and when things go awry; destroy and shred all semblance of evidence; even to the degree of eliminating witnesses, for which “Seth Rich” is an example.  The circumstances of his murder are highly suspect, for the timing and any possible evidence he was privy.  By the way, Fox News did do some investigating into the murder of “Seth Rich”, but something went down and they suddenly dropped it.

Getting back to House Demoncrats… I perceive what they will be doing is peaking into everything Donald Trump has done, quite probably from the day of his birth.  The MSM most assuredly will have their ears perked up for whatever proceeds from any Demoncratic mouth.  If I were President Trump; I would be doing the same kind of investigating the House Demoncrats, to find out whose skeletons make the most noise from the closets.  In addition, I don’t think President Trump is going to sign a budget without his “entire wall on the border” being included.  Fog Head Pelosi said “Nope” when questioned about the wall and added, “It would be immoral”.  One must ask, “Is it immoral to protect American lives and keep from importing criminals, as well as protecting taxpayer’s dollars?”  Somebody, please do the math, as to the cost of the wall being about 25 billion, compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars that will be spent, by allowing illegal immigrants to roam free on our soil.         

Cause and Effect

In recent years, there has been an unprecedented interest in the news.  It matters not so much as to the source, but it is the content that tends to shape public opinion.  This is why most media outlets willingly and knowingly, bias the news to reflect the management’s political views, or to conform to the direction of the blowing political winds.  This is not unlike the practice of former President Clinton, who was an astute politician.  Whatever was exposed during his tenure in the White House was always Bill Clinton’s practice as was during the time of being Governor of Arkansas.  Being more “more exposed” as President of the United States; Bill Clinton was not able to keep so many secrets, as was possible as Governor of Arkansas.  It was also Bill Clinton’s practice to test the political winds of the day; by metaphorically whetting his finger, to see which way the political winds were blowing.  This is why—despite his troubles in office—was able to weather any storm.  Now it seems it is the “Mainstream Media”, along with their Liberal consorts; who are generating those “political winds”. 

The “Clinton Dynasty” was the beginning of the media bias we are experiencing today.  This current “media bias” is the very reason why so many people have tuned out of the likes of CNN; MSNBC; ABC; NBC and CBS.  It was during the Clinton Administration that the acronym of the “Cable News Network, CNN” was aptly made into a by-word for “Clinton News Network”.  This same “bias” of the Mainstream Media was also shielding President Obama; for which those of his party became mute as to anything President Obama did or did not do; despite the law and proper protocol.  By stark contrast; anything that President Trump does or does not do; is instantly twisted to either demonize him or place direct blame, whether or not it makes sense.

It is not enough that the news, in general, is mainly “gloomy”, but this has been the usual trend, in order to grab audience attention, as well as advertising dollars that is the lifeblood of every news media.  It was once stated that in times past—the commercials that dominated the news program slots, were the ones for both “a headache and stomach relief”; and maybe the relaxing effect of a cigarette commercial.  Many media outlets are not unlike the executives of Madison Avenue; which is the advertising district of New York City; where the “headline” is the lead of what story is going to be told.

Social media is rife with much bias, as well as outright lies; because now nearly everyone is armed with an instant camera and “Instagram”; for which a photo can be worth a thousand words.  However, since 1995; digital technology has morphed to a paradigm when any pictorial media can be changed with the click of a mouse.  Movie special effects can easily make up for bad acting, or deficiency of a character; for which these digital effects can make any actor into a superhero.  This by itself has diminished both writing and acting; for which an “Academy Award” is given to the producer of “special effects”.  Compare our current movies with those from the “Golden Age” of moviemaking, when both writing and acting were rewarded and the “special effects” affected only the stand-in or stuntman.

With social media and YouTube; anyone can be a “producer and/or director” of their own production; for which is far too easy to falsify any visual effect and not limited by imagination or fantasy.  With an outlet like YouTube, many can and have produced scenes that seem to be believable, but when someone attempts the same; come up rather short.  The question that needs to be asked, “Is it believable?”  Therefore many of us can appreciate the works of “Mythbusters”, who have taken these unbelievable scenarios and proved many of them to be demonstrably false.  And then there are those who want to make a name for them, and getting in their “15 minutes” of fame, when in fact they committed some horrible act that causes some serious injuries or even caused a death.  This reminds me of one item of interest that came out of the mouth of the late George Carlin, to wit: The next time there is an auto accident; tell the attendants to bring the bodies closer.”

In order to get to the truth of a matter, one must consider the source.  If the source is reliable and proven to be true; this is the source the same can rely upon.  Anytime the following is said: “…from an anonymous source”, must be considered “suspect”.  In addition, if there is a lack of witnesses; one might consider going to another source for confirmation.  If all the above is not good enough; consider the following:  There are only two venues of those who fully understand what is going on behind the news—1) those who create the news and 2) those that know and understand prophecy.

There are a number of those who know and understand the end of this age is coming; for which I am one, and understand the application of prophecy, and indeed some of which has happened as predicted, and much more to follow…why…because God said so.  There are nearly none in any of the media who know and understand prophecy; even if they did; would it be accepted by their bosses?  Not likely…   This is another reason why I have started this particular blog.  I have made some predictions in the past; for which all came true; only because of my understanding of prophecy.  There is one more factor involved, and that is “human nature”.  “Human nature” is what it is, can also be used to making some predictions.  One of those “natures” is greed.  Greed, for the most part, is applicable on a person to person basis, but it can also be easily applied to politics.  Politics is a combination of both “power and greed”, or a greed for power… just follow the money.

The bottom line is; one must know the cause, in order to understand the effect; for this is what is truly behind all news.