It really irks me when the media expounds the civilian losses in Syria. What they do not tell you that at least 24 hours prior to an attack by government forces, leaflets are dropped to warn the residences of the up and coming attack. Most have left, but some stayed and those are the ones who became among the causalities.
The venue that the media uses has a bias slant, which is completely unethical in journalism. This is what happens when the media sides with a particular political party and in this case history is made by preying upon the compassion of the American People to allow the Syrian refuges to enter into the United States unabated.
Here is an example from the New York Times in one of their headlines today:
Vowing to Squeeze Businesses, Trump Has Tactics Challenged
I blogged about this a few days ago about the true economic impact of what Trump accomplished, but the media cites so-called "economic experts" to dissuade the public into believing that what Trump did is gong have negative consequences. Can one hardly believe that $77,000,000 in increased American economic activity in one year is a "negative consequence"? That amount of money is going to be a deciding factor as to businesses that would be affected if they did send those jobs to Mexico and tend to keeping those other affected businesses from closing. Any questions?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I recognize those of opposing views, but be warned; any statements made must be backed up with facts and not from social/political venues. It is an absolute fact that the social/political climate is specifically designed to place riffs where none ever existed before; such as Feminism, Homosexuality and Racism, which were all promulgated by the "Powers That Be" to uphold their creed of "order out of chaos", which will eventually end this civilization. Slavery is repugnant to any civilization even if it is benevolent.