The following was sent by me today to Geoff Lawton, who has a website about permaculture and personally touts "human caused" global warming. Some people are greatly impressed by scientists, doctors and bureaucrats, who thoroughly believe in lies, just because they come from some so-called "authority". When a political "authority" touts something by preying upon the ignorance of the general public... look out! It simply means the agenda is a "power grab" and it is going to take more spending money out of our pockets.

Answer To Human Caused Global Warming

Hi Geoff, the movement for permaculture is not only laudable, but necessary for a growing population and hopefully to squash to even to a small degree, the pollution brought upon us by greedy people. However, one can hardly believe that one or two degrees of "global warming" is so alarming, as to cause a near world-wide panic. The so-called "scientists" who tout "human caused" global warming are mostly government employees and as far back as 1995 when all this began, those government employed scientists who did not believe in "human caused" global warming were instantly fired! That sir is a tattle-tail sign that "human caused" global warming is politically motivated for the sake of the "Powers That Be".

 In addition, computer models are only as good as the data is fed them. There are mitigating factors and possible anomalies that might be missing, such as mathematically, they still do not know why a helicopters and bubble bees fly! Mr. Spock was correct when he stated, "The universe still contains infinite unknowns." Any truthful scientist will plainly admit that is a true statement, despite the fact it came from a fictional tv series.

It is a scientific fact, when the Earth warms up, more clouds form to cool it off. Planet Earth has built-in correcting factors and it could take years if not decades for it to normalize, for whatever "normal" is supposed to be. It is interesting to take careful note that doctors define"normal" as to what the entire population is experiencing and grade it on a curve. When the human race gets sicker and sicker, so-called "normal" can mean having a low degree of disease, compared to what was normal say 50 years ago?

 I think the point is well taken if you view television now as compared to 20 years ago and see how Big Pharma has defined "normal" by being on some kind of drug for even the slightest problem that is simply corrected by proper nutrition. There is an old axiom, that if something needs to be advertised you probably do not need it. All one has to do is listen carefully to all the "side effects" and make the logically determination that the "relief" (not cure) could be worse than the disease.

All those who read this, please be aware that I am not arguing, I am a researcher and have been since grade school and have cultivated writing skills in the past 15 years. What good is research if one cannot share it with those who need it. I am also prodding my readers to be a little more thoughtful and be skeptical, especially when it comes from a government. I say this for the simple reason that once a government gains power, it will not give it up easily. Well.... we do know something about that as to what happened 240 years ago. I am sure many of you remember the “Tea Party”, because of the tax that was placed on tea? Well brace yourselves for a “carbon tax” place upon what has become a basic necessity, just as tea was going back to the “Tea Party”.