February 16^th 2017

I hate to say this, but I told you so… I was very clear in my assessment of the Trump Administration even before President Trump’s inauguration and that it would be an uphill struggle in order to “drain the swamp”.  At this point I need to say that the “swamp” is currently up to President Trump’s neck.  It is quite apparent that the corruption goes both wide and deep.  In my opinion, President Trump needs to at least start to do some serious purging, any moldy leftovers from the Obama Administration.  But this alone is not going to be enough, because there are pockets of power within our government that goes back as far as 1952, for which became known to the then President Eisenhower and passed this information to JFK, who had every intention to remove the corruption, but was assassinated 10 days after making that announcement.  This simply proves just how desperate these “pockets of power” will go, in order to maintain their very sensitive positions.

There is no doubt in my mind that if President Trump reaches too deeply into “the swamp”, those who occupy these very sensitive positions will have no compunction whatsoever to eliminate him, just as they did with JFK.  There is no one in Washington D.C. who will ever admit just how systemic the problem truly lies, because those in the know are fully aware just how dangerous it would be, to provide any hints to reveal the sources of the corruption.  There is so much activity going on just to clean up the mess the Obama Administration left behind, which will make it very difficult to focus on the removal of the ongoing subversion that has been going on in Washington, D.C. for more than 60 years.

Look my friends, no one who is high enough on the totem pole is going to be removed and will never allow themselves to become vulnerable or even close to being threatened, lest they be exposed; so rest assured these no-name “elites” are protected by pawns, who will either wittingly or unwittingly take the fall, thereby leaving these elites untouched.  This is the extreme of what it means to be “politically in control”.  

There is so much shenanigans going on that President Trump is becoming distracted, to the point of slowing things down, for which very little will be accomplished as long as this continues.  Do not expect these distractions to be quelled—it will be one after another—like putting out spontaneous fires, which takes time away from the more important matters.

There is so much brouhaha going on about ObamaCare that we fail to see what is really lurking at the center of all this controversy.  In order to get a proper perspective on this particular situation, we need to go back more than 80 years, when the Social Security Act had taken place.  The Social Security Act was implemented in the “guise” of protecting elderly people from financial disaster.  The “death benefit” (in 1933) was set at $255, in order to cover funeral costs and that figure never changed since that time and today will not even pay for a burial plot.  It is interesting to note that the mortality rate for elderly people was about 62 years in age and the Social Security “benefits” in regards to retirement was set at age 65; so no one can tell me that his “fund” was strictly for the elderly and it became known that our legislatures have dipped into these funds to satisfy their “pork barrel” projects for their local constituents.

One also needs to understand it was the Demoncrats who have morphed the Social Security System into a “sacred cow” and therefore it is the Demoncrats who have taken ownership of this “system”, in order to make them the heroes, whenever Social Security was ever threatened even in the smallest way by those in the opposite isle.  Now that you have some background, it is the Demoncrats who have taken responsibility for the “savior” or our deteriorating health care system, which by the way could have easily been fixed by just one venue and not the mess that it developed into.  

But apparently, because the Demoncrats have been losing “political ground”, they needed another “sacred cow” and the ACA or ObamaCare became the venue they were praying for and for at least the following 6 years since 2010, when the ACA became a so-called “law”, they again have become heroes.  This is why they are vehemently opposed to any changes coming from the opposite isle and will defend ObamaCare even if it implodes, or in my view, “sudden death” and will make the Republicans the blame for the Demoncrats own shortsightedness.

Now my friends, I just stated above a certain phrase that many or all of you simply do not understand and that is “so-called law”.  The ACA or ObamaCare has been touted as “the law of the land”, but from a technical point of view that is an absolute lie!  A “law of the land” would be a constitutional amendment, for which this is not…why…because Obama could not wait for a constitutional convention to take place to consider the matter of government controlled “health care” and would expose the ACA as a fraud, when reading through the 2000 plus pages of the proposed law.  This is why Nancy Pelosi poising herself as a “statesman” said to Congress and in front of the rolling cameras, “We must pass this before we read it.”  In my estimation, this statement by itself merits her dismissal as a viable legislature, but her constituents back home has put her up on a pedestal, consequently re-electing her.

Now to the heart of the matter, as to being the so-called “law of the land”.  Just by virtue that we are required to “sign up” for the ACA is not the touted “law of the land”… no my friends, this is what is called “administrative” or “contract law”, which is voluntary.  There is not one “voluntary” thing in our Constitution, for our Constitution is the “Rule of Law” and it was specifically designed to limit the reach of government into our private lives.  However, it has been the BAR Association and the Progressives who teach law in our colleges, who have morphed the Constitution to be a living document, for which it is not, but they will vehemently defend their stand to their own demise, for which our Forefathers would label all such talk as treason!  It is the difference in these two venues that inspired the title and contents of my book, “What Difference Does It Make?!”   

I have stated before that the BAR is a foreign Communistic organization, which is a union of attorneys who must be a member, in order to practice law in the United States.  There is no such thing as a “specific” license to practice law.  An attorney will apply for a State issued business license for the practice of law, which is the same as a tradesman who applies for license to peddle his/her trade (such as a plumber or electrician) in a particular State.  

President Trump has not allowed the general press continues to lie with impunity, but as I stated in a prior blog; the general media to a high degree is controlled and has been for decades.  There has to be an understanding that there is a war going on, where no blood is spilled; there is no destruction of property and no hostages taken—that war is a war for the control over our minds.  Always remember these two things; 1) the first casualty in any war is the truth and 2) anything political is planned.

I will not stand by and allow ignorance to become the creed of our countrymen.  It is for this very reason that I have produced this blog and the one very important book I have written, “What Difference Does It Make?!” because the two venues of law we are living under must be fully understood if we are to be truly free people in a purported “free society”, because my friends, we are not truly free when we have law that finds us guilty, despite our Constitution, for which we are no longer a party, technically speaking.  And it is this “technicality” that drags us into our “commercial courts”, making us pay for something, for which only the “State” (which is a corporation) is the injured party and not a human being.  I have yet to have anyone challenge me to any degree a debate for these matters of law.  

I am not an ogre and I am not here to belittle anyone at anytime, but facts are facts and yes, the law and society is a black and white venue (not referring to racism) for which there is either right or wrong!  Therefore, I will not apologize for anything here, unless I am demonstrably proven to be wrong.  Let me repeat… I am not in any venue an attorney, but my 20 years plus in the study of law and practicing it in my own way as to my unique understanding of what is really going on and allows me to communicate in this fashion.  I can only apologize for the lengths I will go to, in order to make things as clear as possible and provide as much explanation, as possible, without mincing words.  I want to thank all of you who read this blog and maybe provide a better understanding.