March 22^nd 2017 Blog

Dear readers of this blog; I am not happy…why…because I believe that my readers are not truly interested, or just reading the first and second paragraphs and hang it up.  When one does not understand something, it presupposes does it not, will prompt questions?  I would not enjoy my readers roaming around in ignorance.  In saying this I am not belittling anyone.  In fact I am encouraging my readers to give me feedback.  I have said this before, but it bears repeating; I want to hear the good, the bad and the ugly about anything I write.  If you feel challenged, all the better…why...because this might make me write better, if by chance I am not entirely clear enough.

This blog is a continuation of what I had written yesterday.  Neil Gorsuch is now engaged into round 2 of hearings with the Judiciary Committee.  One can plainly see the political posturing from both sides of the isle… and the beat goes on!  Gorsuch is not the least bit intimidated and unswervingly maintains his stand as being politically neutral, for which his nearly perfect record vindicates him.  The key is that no human being is perfect and the Demoncrats continue to color him as being far less than the records indicate which is why Senator Al Franken cited one particular case that favored a corporation.

Please pay close attention, because this is of extreme importance in understanding Judge Neil Gorsuch judgment in the particular case Al Franken cited.  What I am going to say is going to be backed up by what follows below this paragraph.  I can see why Judge Neil Gorsuch sided with the corporation in this particular case and it has to do with “Contract Law”.  It is quite apparent to me that this employee signed a contract with this corporation, for which I am very sure that Judge Neil Gorsuch read that particular contract and ruled based upon that contract.  If indeed Judge Neil Gorsuch declared that his judgment in that case, was predicated upon the contract that the employee in question signed; and the fact that this confirmation hearing is public, would most certainly tipped the hand of our entire fraudulent court system.  Therefore Judge Neil Gorsuch offered no comment by remained silent.

Neil Gorsuch is seemingly a hero in regards to our Constitution, but he is in as much a quandary as all judges are, only because there are two venues of law at work.  For it is the difference in these two venues of law that inspired me to write, “What Difference Does It Make?!”  The organic venue is our Constitution, but soon after our Civil War, another venue of law began to rear its ugly head, which is Contract or Administrative Law.  I will spare the sorted details of how this happened, but it is sufficient to say that our Citizenship within our respective States, changed from being sovereigns; Citizens with a capital “C” to becoming U.S. citizens with a small “c”.  In law, words mean everything and therefore all words are “case sensitive”.  The difference is not as subtle as one might believe, as was when President Clinton stated, “It all depends what the word “is” is,” which is one of the few truths he had spoken; for in law the word “is” can have 17 different meanings, depending upon the context.

My agenda of this blog is to give at least some rudimentary understanding of what law is and to understand the difference between the two venues.  Yes, I also provide some political analysis and only because of the close ties to the law and because we have two venues of law.  Understanding the difference can mean either freedom or jail time.  

There is so little justice being meted out in our nation, mainly because of the loss of our individual identities, via the Birth Certificate and the Social Security Number.  This is another area that requires a full explanation and I would be doing myself a disservice by putting my entire book into this blog!  For more than 3 months now, I have been giving as much as I can to at least stir up some interest.  But I suppose that just like everyone else, you will hire an attorney to do your dirty work, which is quite sad and I say this with empathy, only because when hiring an attorney you are declaring yourself as being incompetent.  That my friend is not an insult, but this is part of how “The Matrix” is designed.  If you recall, any matrix is a created reality, for which comes the phrase “He who defends himself in court, has a fool for a client.”  And as a matter of fact, there is no law on the books that states you must hire an attorney or have one appointed when going to court.  Even the 6^th Amendment backs this up, when it states “counsel” and can mean anyone; your brother, friend or even yourself, for the simple reason that “counsel” is not defined! 

However, in many courts judges may or may not allow just anyone except an attorney provide representation, but not without some underlining reason, for which will never be revealed, at least not publically.  That “underlining” reason is that all attorneys have 4 basic agendas; 1) the BAR; 2) the court 3) money; 4) the client, all in that specific order!  Anyone who is not an officer of the court does not have any obligation to the whims of the BAR or the court and this is what disturbs many judges, as well as prosecutors. 

Every court has their own “Rules of Procedure”; some published and some not published, for the same reason I cited above and removes a degree of power from the judges.  It must be clearly understood that membership in the BAR is an exclusive club, for which is a very powerful organization and has effectively and incrementally changed our courts, ever since 1938.  Judges have gained so much power that evidence which could vindicate a defendant can be thrown out by any judge, who has already prejudiced the case, according to the present law, for which judges also instruct juries to rule according to the present law, but that my friends is known as “jury tampering”, for it is the juries who have the right to judge both the law and the facts in any case.  Prosecutors are also “officers of the court” who are only promoted upon conviction(s).

In addition, because we accepted both the “Birth Certificate” and the “Social Security Number”, we are no longer a party to the Constitution in matters involving government contracts.  Are you aware that your driver’s license and marriage license are “government contracts”?   I have already explained in prior blogs about the “Birth Certificate” and the “Social Security Number” that destroyed us as individual human beings and morphed us into commercial chattel.  The New Testament Bible describes this as “being made merchandise”.  And I also explained that our name in all capital letters made everyone of us “legal fictions” or corporations and in some circles is referred to as “the straw man”.  You can cite any government document and many commercial documents you want, but you will never find any name that is not in all “capital letters”, for this is the proof we are “commercial chattel”, for which our fraudulent courts are fully aware.  And this is the very reason why when going to court say for a “traffic ticket”, you cannot cite any part of the Constitution in regards to your “Rights”…why…because you signed “government contracts”!

My hope is that I have explained as clearly as possible in as many “laymen” terms as I could.  I want my readers of this blog to have at least a rudimentary understanding of what law is and what it is not.  If I say “policy” is not “law”; do you understand the difference?  “Policy” is what might be described as a “phantom law” and by its very nature can be challenged.  However, since corporations have no inherent rights, being “numbered” and your name in all capital letters makes you a corporation; policies may apply as if they were already law!  “Rules of the court” are policy measures, for which a judge at his/her digression, may declare “contempt of court” if the “Rules of Procedure” in his/her particular court are violated, which means instant jail time.   

The Supreme Court is the very last vestige of justice we have and many times for political expediency, will judge a particular case by interpreting the law in light of whatever direction the political winds are blowing.  It is for this very reason why we need judge Neil Gorsuch as a Supreme Court Justice.  The following is of extreme importance in regards to the subject of “interpretation”.  Our Constitution was specifically written to limit the government’s power over us and at the same time expounds our God-given “Rights” as individuals.  However, it is our Liberal Colleges since 1938 that have declared the Constitution as a “living document”.  This is only because since 1868, “We the People” are now “commercial chattel”.  1938 was a pivotal year for the overt change of how our courts treat us, because of one particular court case of that same year.  Re; “What Difference Does It Make?!”